Legislation verified current as at 25 April 2026view all guides
Legislation current as at 25 April 2026. Check legislation.govt.nz for any amendments.

When Do You Need Resource Consent in New Zealand?

Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), any activity that is not expressly permitted by your local district plan or regional plan will require a resource consent. This guide explains the key triggers, activity classifications, and the application process as of April 2026.

1. The Core Question: Permitted vs. Discretionary

The RMA divides all activities into categories. The most common are:

Key Rule: If your proposal does not meet all permitted activity standards (e.g., height, setback, noise, or earthworks limits), you likely need a resource consent. Check your district plan first.

2. When Specifically Do You Need Consent?

You typically need resource consent when:

Tip: Even if your activity is listed as “permitted,” you must still comply with all conditions. Breaching a condition makes the activity unauthorised and may require retrospective consent.

3. The Effects Assessment

For any discretionary or non-complying activity, you must provide an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE) (RMA s.88 and Schedule 4). The AEE must describe:

Councils use the AEE to decide whether to grant consent and what conditions to impose.

4. The 20-Day Processing Clock

Under RMA s.115, councils must process most resource consent applications within 20 working days (about one calendar month) from the date the application is accepted as complete. However:

Important: The 20-day clock only starts when your application is complete. Incomplete applications (missing AEE, incorrect forms, unpaid fees) will be returned or put on hold.

5. Notification and Appeals

Most applications are processed without public notification if effects are minor and affected parties give written approval (RMA s.95A). If effects are more than minor, the council may:

After a decision, submitters or the applicant can appeal to the Environment Court within 15 working days (RMA s.120). Appeals are on questions of fact or law.

6. Current Reforms (April 2026)

As of April 2026, the Natural and Built Environment Act 2023 (NBA) is being phased in, but the RMA 1991 still applies to most existing plans. The NBA will eventually replace the RMA, but for now, all resource consent applications are processed under the RMA unless your region has transitioned. Check with your council.

Need help with your resource consent?

Our team can assess your project, prepare the AEE, and manage the application process. Start your application in the portal or call 0800 123 456.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a permitted activity and a discretionary activity?
A permitted activity does not require resource consent as long as you comply with all conditions in the district plan (e.g., building a standard shed under 10m²). A discretionary activity requires consent, and the council has full discretion to grant or refuse it, considering all effects (RMA s.87C).
How long does resource consent take in NZ?
For non-notified applications, the council must process it within 20 working days from acceptance (RMA s.115). If publicly notified, the clock extends to 70 working days. Delays often occur if the council requests further information under s.92.
Do I need resource consent for a fence?
It depends on your district plan. Most fences under 2.5m in height are permitted activities. However, fences on boundaries, near roads, or in heritage areas may require consent. Always check the plan's permitted activity standards.
What happens if I build without resource consent?
You may be served an enforcement order under RMA s.314, requiring you to remove the structure or apply for retrospective consent. Fines can be up to $300,000 for individuals and $600,000 for companies (RMA s.339).
Can I appeal a resource consent decision?
Yes. Any submitter or the applicant can appeal to the Environment Court within 15 working days of the decision (RMA s.120). The appeal must be based on a question of law or fact, not just disagreement.